Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Progress and prospects of safety assessment methods of medicinal and food homologous substances].

Authors: Pei, Cao; Meng-Meng, Gao; Min, Chen; Lei, Zhang;

[Progress and prospects of safety assessment methods of medicinal and food homologous substances].

Abstract

Food and medicinal substances(FAMS) with both edible and medicinal uses have a long history in China, being an important part of China's excellent traditional culture and traditional Chinese medicine(TCM). The legal management of FAMS is in the form of catalogue, which has a history of nearly 40 years. More than 100 substances have been included in the China's FAMS catalogue. According to the Regulation of Food and Medicinal Substances Catalogue, safety assessment is a basis for substances to be included in the catalogue. The safety assessment of FAMS should follow the principles and requirements of food safety risk assessment. However, FAMS is a complex mixture, and the nature and data adequacy of the assessed substance should be comprehensively considered. Different eva-luation models and methods should be selected according to the principle of case analysis. With the development of next-generation technologies such as big data, artificial intelligence, high-throughput and high-content in vitro testing, and computational toxicology and the trend of increasing edible substances with medicinal effects applying for the inclusion in the China's FAMS catalogue, the methods of risk assessment are applied in the management of FAMS, novel food products, and local characteristic food products, playing a scientific role. This paper systematically reviews the methods, challenges, and prospects of safety assessment of FAMS.

Related Organizations
Keywords

China, Food Safety, Humans, Animals, Medicine, Chinese Traditional, Risk Assessment, Drugs, Chinese Herbal

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!