Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Urinary microbial load evaluation: comparison of an agar-colony count method and a colorimetric method].

Authors: G, Usai; P, Terzaroli; F, Ameglio;

[Urinary microbial load evaluation: comparison of an agar-colony count method and a colorimetric method].

Abstract

The quantity of bacteria of 500 urocultures was analyzed in the Laboratory of Clinical Pathology of the "Regina Elena" Institute of Rome (Italy). These evaluations were carried out both by the classic agar colony-count method (CC) and by a new colorimetric system (Dye test, Dt), recently introduced on the market. Using the CC system, 142 (28.6%) positive and 358 (71.8%) negative samples were found, considering the usual 100,000 CFU/ml to be the limit. The results of the colorimetric test were read on a graduated scale of red color. By means of a concordance analysis, a correct relationship between the color grade and the positivity of the samples was established. For this equivalence a more intense color than that suggested by the manufacturer was found. Furthermore an 89.7% rate of concordant and a 10.2% of discordant results were observed. These latter may be divided into two fractions: the first (4.6%) was Dt-positive and CC-negative (these samples are characterized by the presence of residual antibiotics in 78.3% of the cases); the second fraction (5.6%) was Dt-negative and CC-positive (characterized by a 67.9% of Pseudomonas sp. isolation frequency).

Keywords

Bacteriological Techniques, Bacteriuria, Urinary Tract Infections, Humans, Colorimetry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!