Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Detection of bacteremia by biphasic and radiometric methods].

Authors: G, Mucignat; V, Chiaradia; L, Pascoli; G, Tarabini Castellani; M L, Modolo; W, De Cal; G, Santini;

[Detection of bacteremia by biphasic and radiometric methods].

Abstract

During one year period our laboratory carried out 859 hemocultures. These have been evaluated with two methods: a conventional biphasic method (Castaneda bottles), and the automated radiometric method (Bactec System). 185 cultures were obtained with one or both methods. Of these 3.5% were considered contaminated, therefore the clinically significant isolation rate was 16.2%. Of these 86.4% was recovered by biphasic system and 79.8% by Bactec System. The recovery time to positivity and spectrum of isolates were similar for the two methods. Although there were substantially more contaminants isolated in the Vacutainer-Bactec System.

Keywords

Bacteriological Techniques, Sepsis, Humans, Radiometry, Culture Media

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!