Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Neuroendocrine expression markers in triple-negative, luminal-A, luminal-B and HER2neu breast cancer].

Authors: Yesica Guadalupe, Barboza-García; Lázaro, Ramírez-Balderrama; Mario, Murguía-Pérez; Martha Alicia, Hernández-González; Isette Yunue, Landeros-Navarro;

[Neuroendocrine expression markers in triple-negative, luminal-A, luminal-B and HER2neu breast cancer].

Abstract

Primary breast tumors with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation are a heterogeneous tumor group with diversity of biological behavior, with poorly defined prevalence and prognosis.To evaluate the chromogranin, synaptophysin, CD56, INSM1 markers expression prevalence and the association between NE differentiation and tumor molecular type.Observational, cross-sectional study which included 110 breast tissue samples with primary invasive carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was performed for chromogranin, synaptophysin, CD56 and INMS1 markers. NE differentiation was considered with 10-90% positive cells, and NE tumor with > 90% positive cells.26.3% showed neuroendocrine differentiation. Out of these, 48.2% were luminal-A type, 24.1% luminal-B, 11.5% HER2neu, 17.2% triple-negative; 1.8% were NE tumors. Tumors were marker positive, and out of these to chromogranin in 24.5%, synaptophysin in 28.2%, CD56 in 2.7%, INSM1 in 16.4%. Synaptophysin was expressed in 17.3% luminal-A type, 6.4% luminal-B, 0.9% HER2neu, 3.6% triple-negative. NE differentiation showed association with synaptophysin expression (r = 0.586, p = 0.0001).The NE differentiation prevalence was 26.3% in primary invasive breast cancers, with luminal-A molecular type predominance.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Synaptophysin, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Immunohistochemistry, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, CD56 Antigen, Repressor Proteins, Cross-Sectional Studies, Biomarkers, Tumor, Chromogranins, Humans, Female, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!