Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Marrow harvesting for autologous marrow transplantation.

Authors: N R, Jin; R S, Hill; F B, Petersen; C D, Buckner; P S, Stewart; D, Amos; F R, Appelbaum; +3 Authors

Marrow harvesting for autologous marrow transplantation.

Abstract

The results and complications of 224 marrow collections from 200 patients with malignant disease who underwent marrow aspiration and storage for subsequent autologous marrow transplantation (AMT) were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 35 years (range 1-68); 131 patients had hematologic malignancies and 69 had solid tumors. Thirty-one patients proceeded directly to AMT after marrow aspiration at a median of 4.5 days (range 0-10). A further 75 patients received AMT a median of 3.0 months (12 days-10 years) after marrow aspiration. The remaining 94 patients had marrow stored but not infused. When a second aspiration was performed from the same patient within seven weeks, the yield of marrow nucleated cells was significantly reduced (p less than 0.02). A negative linear correlation was observed between CFU-C/kg harvested and the day to achieve a posttransplant blood neutrophil count greater than 500/cmm (r = -0.3092, p less than 0.05). A total of 36 (17.4%) complications associated with marrow aspiration were observed including two (0.97%) life-threatening episodes. Postoperative fever accounted for 23 of 34 episodes of minor complications. There was no increased risk of serious complications with decreased time from aspiration to transplant. It was concluded that the morbidity and mortality from autologous marrow aspiration did not differ significantly from that observed in normal donors.

Keywords

Adult, Cell Nucleus, Male, Adolescent, Fever, Infant, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Bone Marrow Cells, Cell Count, Pneumonia, Middle Aged, Specimen Handling, Child, Preschool, Humans, Anesthesia, Blood Transfusion, Female, Child, Aged, Bone Marrow Transplantation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    38
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
38
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!