Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Evaluation of the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of conjunctival neoplasms : Comparison with histological findings after excision].

Authors: Arved Rikus, Gruben; Kristin, Hösel; Johann, Roider; Christoph, Ehlken;

[Evaluation of the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of conjunctival neoplasms : Comparison with histological findings after excision].

Abstract

Neoplasms of the conjunctiva include many different entities with a broad variety of clinical presentations. This can make a precise clinical diagnosis difficult. R0 resection is the gold standard treatment for most malignant conjunctival neoplasms, but not every benign lesions must treated by excision. In clinical practice it is important to make an accurate clinical diagnosis to enable the best possible management of conjunctival neoplasms.The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of neoplasms of the conjunctiva.Within a retrospective design, the data from all patients with excision of a conjunctival lesion between 2011 and 2020 in the Department of Ophthalmology of the UKSH Campus Kiel were extracted and analyzed. The specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive value for the preoperative clinical rating of dignity and diagnosis were evaluated based on the histological diagnostic findings.Of 220 included cases, 75% were benign and 25% malignant. The most frequent neoplasm of the conjunctiva was benign conjunctival nevus. The sensitivity for clinical prediction of a benign lesion was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.92), the specificity 0.95 (CI 0.85-0.99), and the positive predictive value 0.98 (CI 0.94-1.0). The sensitivity for clinical prediction of malign dignity was 0.95 (CI 0.85-0.99), the specificity 0.88 (CI 0.83-0.93), and the positive predictive value 0.73 (CI 0.61-0.83).The derived values for clinical diagnosis of conjunctival neoplasms can be rated as good. However, in clinical practice, untypical lesions can be hard to diagnose correctly, and the clinical diagnosis should be carefully reviewed; if in doubt, excision should be preferred.

Keywords

Male, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Adolescent, Conjunctival Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Young Adult, Predictive Value of Tests, Humans, Female, Child, Conjunctiva, Retrospective Studies, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!