Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Orthopaedic robot assisted femoral neck dynamic cross fixation system for the treatment of femoral neck fractures].

Authors: Xi-Zhu, Wang; Yi-Min, Chen; Wei, Han; Han, Fei; Xue, Zhang; Ling, Li; Jun-Qiang, Wang;

[Orthopaedic robot assisted femoral neck dynamic cross fixation system for the treatment of femoral neck fractures].

Abstract

To explore and compare the clinical efficacy of orthopedic robot assisted femoral neck system (FNS) and traditional manual FNS in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in middle-aged and young people.The clinical data of 62 consecutive patients with femoral neck fracture and age less than 65 years old admitted to the Intelligent Orthopaedic Department of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from June 2021 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether orthopedic robot-assisted surgery the patients were divided into two groups:30 patients aged 34 to 56 years old were treated with orthopedic robot assisted FNS internal fixation after closed or limited open reduction(experimental group); 32 patients aged 33 to 54 years old underwent FNS internal fixation after closed or limited open reduction(control group). The age, gender, time from injury to admission, average hospital stay, surgical duration, intraoperative bleeding volume, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency of two groups of patients were analyzed and compared. The hip joint function in both groups of patients was evaluated using the Harris hip joint scoring standard at 6 months after surgery.All 62 patients with femoral neck fractures successfully completed the surgery. There was no significant difference(P>0.05) between the experimental group and the control group in terms of baseline data such as age, gender, time from injury to admission, time from admission to surgery and the intraoperative bleeding. The surgical duration of the experimental group was significantly shorter than that of the control group [42.1(28.5, 50.7)min vs. 53.4(36.9, 62.5) min, Z=-2.338, P=0.019]. The intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy frequency of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group[8.0 (6.0, 11.0) times vs. 15.0(13.0, 17.0) times, Z=-5.960, P0.05).Compared with manual operation of FNS, orthopedic robot assisted FNS in the treatment of femoral neck fractures can help shorten surgical time, reduce intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and have similar therapeutic effects on long-term hip joint function recovery.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Fracture Fixation, Internal, Orthopedics, Treatment Outcome, Adolescent, Femur Neck, Humans, Robotics, Middle Aged, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Femoral Neck Fractures

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!