
A proposal is worked out to express x-ray image quality by means of a meaningful and practically useful numerical system. Attennations have been selected in such a manner that whole numbers of Quality Value figures ranging from -10 to +60 result in meaningful associations with radiological indications. Individual parameters are incorporated into the resulting values. A test body for determining Information Sensitivity figures is described that is practical easy built and inexpensive; its most important feature, however, is that it is reproducible and permits international comparisons. This test body provides a direct linking with the Quality Value figures.
Models, Anatomic, Humans, Image Enhancement, Technology, Radiologic, Mathematics
Models, Anatomic, Humans, Image Enhancement, Technology, Radiologic, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
