Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Dot-ELISA for the rapid serodiagnosis of human hydatid disease.

Authors: M G, Pappas; P M, Schantz; L T, Cannon; S P, Wahlquist;

Dot-ELISA for the rapid serodiagnosis of human hydatid disease.

Abstract

We studied the serodiagnosis of human hydatid disease using the dot-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (dot-ELISA) and the indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA). Hydatid cyst fluid antigens from sheep were highly reactive against a battery of positive human sera. Moose-derived antigen was less reactive, whereas human- and camel-derived antigens showed nonspecific false-positive reactions. Sensitivity of the Dot-ELISA was 96% using sheep-derived antigen and 45 human sera from 43 surgically proven cases of hydatidosis disease caused by Echinococcus granulosus, E. multilocularis and E. vogeli. The IHA test reacted with 100% of patient sera (P = N.S.). Specificity of the dot-ELISA was 98%; one false-positive reaction was observed in the dot-ELISA when 52 sera from healthy subjects were assayed. Cross-reactions were observed with sera from patients with cysticercosis, filariasis, toxocariasis, trichinosis, visceral larval migrans, and liver cirrhosis. Of 204 sera tested in duplicate, 191 (94%) did not vary more than one twofold titer dilution. The dot-ELISA is rapid and as sensitive as the IHA test in the diagnosis of hydatidosis. In addition, unlike other currently performed tests for hydatid disease, this rapid and economical enzyme immunoassay is very antigen-conservative, requiring only nanogram quantities of parasite antigen, and very serum conservative, needing only 50 microliter of diluted patient serum.

Keywords

Antibody Specificity, Echinococcosis, Predictive Value of Tests, Humans, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Serologic Tests, Hemagglutination Tests, Cross Reactions

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!