
pmid: 38058572
pmc: PMC10696153
Background: Cross-calibration of 123I-labeled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) myocardial-derived indices is essential to extrapolate findings from several clinical centers. Here, we conducted a phantom study to generate conversion coefficients for the calibration of heart-to-mediastinum ratios and compare them between Taiwan and Europe. Methods: We used an acrylic phantom dedicated to 123I-mIBG planar imaging to calculate the conversion coefficients of 136 phantom images derived from 36 Taiwanese institutions. A European phantom image database including 191 images from 27 institutions was used. Conversion coefficients were categorized into five collimator types: low-energy (LE) high-resolution (LEHR), LE general-purpose (LEGP), extended LEGP (ELEGP), medium-energy (ME) GP (MEGP), and ME low-penetration (MELP) collimators. Results: The conversion coefficients were 0.53 ± 0.039, 0.59 ± 0.032, 0.79 ± 0.032, 0.96 ± 0.038, and 0.99 ± 0.050 for LEHR, LEGP, ELEGP, MEGP, and MELP collimators, respectively. The Taiwanese and European conversion coefficients for the LEHR, LEGP, and MELP collimators did not significantly differ. The coefficient of variation was slightly higher for the Taiwanese than the European conversion coefficients (3.7%-7.5% vs. 2.3%-5.6%). Conclusions: We calculated conversion coefficients for various types of collimators used in Taiwan using a 123I-mIBG phantom. In general, the Taiwanese and European conversion coefficients were comparable. These findings further corroborated and highlighted the need for 123I-mIBG standardization using the phantom-determined conversion coefficients.
Original Article
Original Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
