Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Acute Aortic Dissection with Visceral Malperfusion Syndrome].

Authors: Taishi, Inoue; Kenji, Okada;

[Acute Aortic Dissection with Visceral Malperfusion Syndrome].

Abstract

Malperfusion syndrome of the visceral branches associated with acute aortic dissection brings an extremely poor outcomes leading to perioperative and long-term mortality in both Stanford type A and type B acute aortic dissection. The conventional surgical strategy for these cases has been to prioritize aortic repair and to improve blood flow of true lumen in aorta and visceral branches. Today, various techniques for early reperfusion have been reported. For bowel ischemia, it is necessary to evaluate substantial ischemia of the intestinal tract and hypoperfusion of the superior mesenteric artery( SMA) using contrast-enhanced computed tomography( CT) and intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in addition to clinical presentation. The most important factor of the surgical intervention is the improvement of true luminal blood flow by reconstruction of the central aorta. However, an intervention to SMA prior to central aortic repair might be an important process for patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection to avoid irreversible bowel necrosis. In type B aortic dissection, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with or without provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT) technique and additional SMA intervention based on intraoperative contrast findings are necessary. Renal malperfusion is also a risk factor of postoperative accute kidney injury( AKI) and perioperative mortality. The revascularizations of renal arteries might improve outcomes when renal blood flow was not recovered with central aortic repair.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Aortic Dissection, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Treatment Outcome, Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, Ischemia, Endovascular Procedures, Acute Disease, Humans, Stents, Syndrome, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!