
Malperfusion syndrome of the visceral branches associated with acute aortic dissection brings an extremely poor outcomes leading to perioperative and long-term mortality in both Stanford type A and type B acute aortic dissection. The conventional surgical strategy for these cases has been to prioritize aortic repair and to improve blood flow of true lumen in aorta and visceral branches. Today, various techniques for early reperfusion have been reported. For bowel ischemia, it is necessary to evaluate substantial ischemia of the intestinal tract and hypoperfusion of the superior mesenteric artery( SMA) using contrast-enhanced computed tomography( CT) and intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in addition to clinical presentation. The most important factor of the surgical intervention is the improvement of true luminal blood flow by reconstruction of the central aorta. However, an intervention to SMA prior to central aortic repair might be an important process for patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection to avoid irreversible bowel necrosis. In type B aortic dissection, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with or without provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT) technique and additional SMA intervention based on intraoperative contrast findings are necessary. Renal malperfusion is also a risk factor of postoperative accute kidney injury( AKI) and perioperative mortality. The revascularizations of renal arteries might improve outcomes when renal blood flow was not recovered with central aortic repair.
Aortic Dissection, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Treatment Outcome, Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, Ischemia, Endovascular Procedures, Acute Disease, Humans, Stents, Syndrome, Retrospective Studies
Aortic Dissection, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Treatment Outcome, Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, Ischemia, Endovascular Procedures, Acute Disease, Humans, Stents, Syndrome, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
