Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ PubMed Centralarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Neonatology
Article . 2024
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Intrauterine Detection of Ureaplasma Species after Vaginal Colonization in Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcome.

Authors: Rittenschober-Boehm, Judith; Fuiko, Renate; Farr, Alex; Willinger, Birgit; Berger, Angelika; Goeral, Katharina;

Intrauterine Detection of Ureaplasma Species after Vaginal Colonization in Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcome.

Abstract

Intrauterine infection with Ureaplasma species (U.spp.) is mostly a result of vaginal colonization with subsequent ascending infection and is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. Little is known about rates and risk factors for ascending infection. Aim of the current study was to analyse the frequency of ascending U.spp. infection in vaginally colonized pregnant women delivering preterm and subsequent short- and long-term outcome of infants.Women delivering ≤32 weeks of gestation with available data on vaginal U.spp. colonization in early pregnancy as well as amniotic and placental colonization screening during caesarean section were included. Neonatal short- and long-term outcome was analysed depending on vaginal and intrauterine colonization.Seventy-two women giving birth to 104 preterm infants were included. Intrauterine microbial invasion was found in 23/72 (31.9%) pregnancies. The most commonly detected organisms were U.spp. (52.2%), followed by E. coli (21.7%) and Enterococcus faecalis (17.4%). Intrauterine growth of U.spp. occurred exclusively after previous vaginal colonization in early pregnancy (42/72; 58.3%) and was found in 12/42 (28.6%) cases. Ascending U.spp. infection mainly occurred in pregnancies delivering <28 weeks after preterm rupture of membranes or preterm labour (9/17, 52.3%). Intrauterine detection of U.spp., but not vaginal colonization, was associated with a significantly higher rate of severe intraventricular haemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and unfavourable psychomotor outcome.Ascending U.spp. infection after previous vaginal colonization occurred in almost one-third of pregnancies delivering ≤32 weeks, with particularly high rates in those <28 weeks, and was associated with adverse outcome of preterm infants.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Original Paper, Cesarean Section, Placenta, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy Outcome, Infant, Ureaplasma, Pregnancy, Escherichia coli, Humans, Premature Birth, Female, Infant, Premature

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green