
Symptoms of dysphagia and chronic vomiting often are categorized as being elicited by psychogenic factors, when no explanation can be found by fluoroscopic and endoscopic means. Psychogenic factors were also thought to be of aetiological significance in 58 patients referred under the diagnoses "psychogenic", "psychosomatic", and "functional" swallowing disorder, "psychogenic vomiting", "conversion neurosis", "anorexia nervosa", "psychosomatic disturbances in pregnancy", "cancer phobia", "cardiac phobia (DaCosta syndrome)", and "depressive disorder" to the Psychophysiology Unit, University of Vienna, for further evaluation. However, manometric, pH-metric, and endoscopic investigations showed that all of these patients suffered in fact from organic disorders: 36 from achalasia, 5 from vigorous achalasia, 5 from diffuse oesophageal spasms, 6 from lower oesophageal contraction abnormalities, one from pharyngo-oesophageal dyscoordination, one from a gastric ulcer ad cardiam, and 4 from gastro-oesophageal refluxes of whom one also had a hypertonic upper oesophageal sphincter. These findings, together with the fact that all concepts relating swallowing disorders to psychogenic factors have remained purely speculative, show that it is not justifiable to label dysphagic symptoms, for which no organic aetiology can be detected, as "psychogenic" or "psychosomatic". Patients with such symptoms should be studied by means of oesophageal manometry and/or pH-metry to reveal the nature of their disorder and to enable adequate therapy.
Adult, Male, Spasm, Esophageal Diseases, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Diagnosis, Differential, Esophageal Achalasia, Esophageal Stenosis, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Female, Peristalsis, Deglutition Disorders
Adult, Male, Spasm, Esophageal Diseases, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Diagnosis, Differential, Esophageal Achalasia, Esophageal Stenosis, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Female, Peristalsis, Deglutition Disorders
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
