Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Application of sequential methods in randomized clinical trials with censored response criteria].

Authors: J, Benichou; C, Chastang;

[Application of sequential methods in randomized clinical trials with censored response criteria].

Abstract

In randomized clinical trials with a censored response criterion, it is common practice to perform interim analyses, especially for reasons of medical ethics. Sequential methods allow for repeated testing. Three sequential methods are well adapted to censored data: the group sequential analysis, the sequential probability ratio test and the triangular test. Among them, the triangular test has the best statistical properties. The influence of the frequency of the analyses on the statistical properties of sequential methods has been studied by simulation: sequential analyses need not be performed more frequently than interim analyses. Sequential methods have been applied to several randomized clinical trials. The results are briefly reported for two of them. The ability of the triangular test and of the sequential probability ratio test to reach conclusions early when there is no difference between two compared treatments is supported by these two examples. Moreover, careful patient follow-up must be planned in the protocol in order to reduce the time for data updating and to perform sequential analyses at the required frequency. It appears well-founded to propose the use of the triangular test in randomized clinical trials with a censored response criterion. Four types of analyses with different aims must be planned in the protocol.

Keywords

Clinical Trials as Topic, Random Allocation, Lung Neoplasms, Aspirin, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Leukemia, Lymphoid

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!