Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Levels of tPSA and fPSA and count of peripheral blood neutrophils in the diagnosis of prostate cancer].

Authors: Sheng-Qiang, Zhang; Qiang, Su;

[Levels of tPSA and fPSA and count of peripheral blood neutrophils in the diagnosis of prostate cancer].

Abstract

To investigate the value of combined detection of tPSA, fPSA and peripheral blood neutrophil count (Neut#) in the diagnosis of PCa.This study included 238 cases of PCa, 328 cases of BPH and 303 normal men as healthy controls present at our hospital for medical or physical examination from August 2018 to December 2021. We detected the levels of serum tPSA and fPSA and Neut# of the subjects, and assessed the value of the combined detection in the diagnosis of PCa using logistic regression analysis, ROC curves, Pearman correlation analysis and nonparametric test.There were significant differences in the tPSA and fPSA levels and Neut# between any two of the PCa, BPH and healthy control groups (P < 0.05). The index N of the combined detection of tPSA, fPSA and Neut# showed an evidently higher diagnostic value than that of any single-item detection. The Gleason scores of the subjects were correlated positively with the tPSA and fPSA levels and index N, with the correlation coefficients of 0.184, 0.245 and 0.166 respectively, P < 0.05), and negatively with the Neut#, with the correlation coefficient of -0.168, P < 0.05). Statistically significant differences were observed in the tPSA and fPSA levels, Neut# and index N in those with different Gleason scores (P < 0.05).The combined detection of tPSA, fPSA and Neut# improves the diagnosis of PCa and can be applied clinically as an auxiliary diagnostic method.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, ROC Curve, Neutrophils, Prostatic Hyperplasia, Humans, Prostatic Neoplasms, Prostate-Specific Antigen

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!