Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors: C, Servadio; H, Winkler; M, Neuman; H, Hadar;

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Abstract

Our initial experience with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 46 randomly selected patients included 16 who had undergone previous surgery for calculi. A urologist and radiologist cooperated closely in carrying out the procedure, which was performed in one or two stages (16 and 30 cases respectively). Calculi were successfully removed from 80.4% of the patients with the use of grasping forceps or ultrasonic lithotripsy. Operating time ranged from 30 to 180 min and the average hospital stay was 8 days. Complications were few and of a transient nature. Further experience and patient selection is necessary in order to reduce the time and cost of this procedure.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Radiography, Kidney Calculi, Adolescent, Humans, Female, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Aged, Nephrostomy, Percutaneous

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!