Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Efficacy and Safety of Omalizumab Updosing in Chronic Urticaria: A Retrospective Study.

Authors: Fatma Asli, Hapa; Fatma Elif, Yıldırım;

Efficacy and Safety of Omalizumab Updosing in Chronic Urticaria: A Retrospective Study.

Abstract

Omalizumab is an effective and safe treatment option with licensed doses in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU); however, some patients are not responsive to licensed doses and require updosing. As studies concerning updosing were insufficient, the present study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of omalizumab updosing (300 mg every 2 weeks) in CSU patients. Data of CSU patients treated with omalizumab were analyzed retrospectively. As an outcome measure, physician assessment of treatment response (complete response [CR], partial response, and unresponsiveness) was used. In all, 49 patients depicting CR to omalizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks and 54 patients treated with omalizumab 300 mg every 2 weeks were included in the study. Mean duration of the disease in updosing group was significantly lengthier than the CR group. The mean percentage level of eosinophils and basophils was significantly higher in the CR group. The history of systemic corticosteroid and oral cyclosporine treatment was significantly more frequent in the updosing group. Treatment with omalizumab 300 mg every 2 weeks for 12 weeks led to CR in 41 patients (75.9%). Our results confirmed the efficacy and safety of omalizumab updosing. Low baso-phil and eosinophil levels could also be important factors in defining the need for updosing.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cyclosporine, Humans, Administration, Oral, Chronic Urticaria, Omalizumab, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!