Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Sex difference in the micronucleus test. The Collaborative Study Group for the Micronucleus Test.

Sex difference in the micronucleus test. The Collaborative Study Group for the Micronucleus Test.

Abstract

Since sex difference seemed to be one of the most urgent issues to be clarified among many parameters in protocols for the micronucleus test, the collaborative study group for the micronucleus test, consisting of members of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society, focused on this subject first. 20 clastogens were examined for sex-related differences of response in the micronucleus test with male and female mice at 20 participating laboratories, one at each laboratory. The results obtained were analyzed and 10 out of the 20 compounds were chosen for further tests for confirmation and re-examination. As a rule, each retested compound was evaluated at 2 laboratories with different strains of mice. The overall results of the first and second trials indicate that (1) all compounds induced micronuclei in both male and female mice, (2) 2-acetylaminofluorene (2-AAF), benzene, benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), and 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA) induced significantly higher incidences of micronuclei in males than in females, (3) ethyl methanesulfonate induced more micronuclei in females than in males, and (4) the other compounds showed almost the same responses in males and females or slightly higher responses in males than in females. The higher susceptibility of male mice to 2-AAF, B[a]P, and DMBA has, to our knowledge, not previously been reported. Based upon these results, we suggest that the use of male mice is sufficient for general screening by the micronucleus test.

Keywords

Cell Nucleus, Male, Mice, Sex Characteristics, Mutagenicity Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Animals, Female, Mutagens

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!