Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Allergologia et Immu...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

[Forced mid-expiratory flow rate (FEF 25-75%): a critical analysis of its value in recognizing diseases of the small airways].

Authors: M, Terra Filho; F S, Vargas; A, Cukier; E, Fiss; M, Romeiro Neto; J, Croce;

[Forced mid-expiratory flow rate (FEF 25-75%): a critical analysis of its value in recognizing diseases of the small airways].

Abstract

A total of 245 patients submitted to lung function test were studied. They were divided in 2 groups: A--FEV1.0/FVC greater than or equal to 75% and B--FEF25-75% less than 75%. These groups were further subdivided according to the age of the patients--subgroup 1 less than or equal to 50 years and subgroup 2 greater than 50 years. Patients with restrictive disorders were not included. The spirometric equipment employed was Hewlett-Packard Inc. Pulmonary Function Analyzer 47402-A. The results were obtained through a digital system and calculated from a graph impressed in a xy register. Results were automatically corrected to BTPS. In each group FVC and FEV1.0 were normal. In group A FVC and FEV1.0 were, respectively: A1-99.63 +/- 13.33 and 101.11 +/- 12.24, A2-97.60 +/- 11.06 and 98.81 +/- 12.18, expressed as percentage of predicted values. In group B the results were: B1-97.61 +/- 13.55% and 81.71 +/- 14.44%; B2-100.28 +/- 13.98% and 83.10 +/- 16.42%. The differences were not statistically significant at 5%. In subgroup A1 X FEV1.0/CVF was 83.41 +/- 5.63% and in subgroup A2, 79.42 +/- 4.23%. Maximum mid-expiratory flow rate was 88.64 +/- 24.39% in subgroup A1 and 65.26 +/- 17.88% in subgroup A2. These differences were statistically significant at 1%. In group B, FEV1.0/FVC was always less than 75%. In subgroup B1 it was 68.24 +/- 10.43% and in B2, 64.90 +/- 10.43% and values for FEF25-75% were 48.13 +/- 16.48% and 42.79 +/- 17.68%, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Vital Capacity, Age Factors, Humans, Bronchial Diseases, Female, Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate, Middle Aged, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
gold