
A total of 245 patients submitted to lung function test were studied. They were divided in 2 groups: A--FEV1.0/FVC greater than or equal to 75% and B--FEF25-75% less than 75%. These groups were further subdivided according to the age of the patients--subgroup 1 less than or equal to 50 years and subgroup 2 greater than 50 years. Patients with restrictive disorders were not included. The spirometric equipment employed was Hewlett-Packard Inc. Pulmonary Function Analyzer 47402-A. The results were obtained through a digital system and calculated from a graph impressed in a xy register. Results were automatically corrected to BTPS. In each group FVC and FEV1.0 were normal. In group A FVC and FEV1.0 were, respectively: A1-99.63 +/- 13.33 and 101.11 +/- 12.24, A2-97.60 +/- 11.06 and 98.81 +/- 12.18, expressed as percentage of predicted values. In group B the results were: B1-97.61 +/- 13.55% and 81.71 +/- 14.44%; B2-100.28 +/- 13.98% and 83.10 +/- 16.42%. The differences were not statistically significant at 5%. In subgroup A1 X FEV1.0/CVF was 83.41 +/- 5.63% and in subgroup A2, 79.42 +/- 4.23%. Maximum mid-expiratory flow rate was 88.64 +/- 24.39% in subgroup A1 and 65.26 +/- 17.88% in subgroup A2. These differences were statistically significant at 1%. In group B, FEV1.0/FVC was always less than 75%. In subgroup B1 it was 68.24 +/- 10.43% and in B2, 64.90 +/- 10.43% and values for FEF25-75% were 48.13 +/- 16.48% and 42.79 +/- 17.68%, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Vital Capacity, Age Factors, Humans, Bronchial Diseases, Female, Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate, Middle Aged, Aged
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Vital Capacity, Age Factors, Humans, Bronchial Diseases, Female, Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate, Middle Aged, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
