Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Labor management following previous cesarean section].

Authors: M, Lahousen; R, Burmucic;

[Labor management following previous cesarean section].

Abstract

Between January 1, 1982 and March 31, 1984, 300 patients were delivered at Graz Gynaecological Clinic who had undergone Caesarean section during their previous delivery or deliveries at the clinic. It was possible to deliver 166 patients (55.3%) of their children vaginally. The rate of spontaneous labour was as high as 91.8% in a group of 61 women who had given birth vaginally once or several times either before or since the Caesarean section. Successful vaginal delivery occurred in 73.5% or 80.6% if the indication for the previous Caesarean section was a breech presentation or a foetal distress, and in 31.7% or 30.6% of those patients whose indication for their previous Caesarean section was a cephalopelvic disproportion or a prolonged labour. The Caesarean section had to be repeated in a total of 134 parturients (44.7%). Of these, the second Caesarean section was indicated primarily (electively) in 29.1%, secondarily in 70.9%. A rupture in the area of the old Caesarean scar occurred in 5 out of 300 cases (1.7%). In four cases this was diagnosed intraoperatively, and once during post partum palpation of the uterine cavity.

Keywords

Reoperation, Risk, Asphyxia Neonatorum, Cesarean Section, Infant, Newborn, Puerperal Disorders, Pelvimetry, Fetal Distress, Obstetric Labor Complications, Postoperative Complications, Pregnancy, Apgar Score, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!