Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ GMS Journal for Medi...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
GMS Journal for Medical Education
Article . 2023
Data sources: DOAJ
German Medical Science
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

From summative MAAS Global to formative MAAS 2.0 - a workshop report.

Authors: Stamer, T; Essers, G; Steinhäuser, J; Flägel, K;

From summative MAAS Global to formative MAAS 2.0 - a workshop report.

Abstract

Hintergrund: Der MAAS-Global (Maastricht history-taking and advise scoring list ) ist ein international vielfältig in der medizinischen Aus- und Weiterbildung eingesetztes Instrument. Schwerpunkte liegen auf der Beurteilung ärztlicher Kommunikations- sowie klinischer Fertigkeiten. Das seit 2015 auch in Deutschland angewandte Beurteilungsinstrument besitzt eine hohe Qualität in Design (u. a. nachvollziehbarer Aufbau, angemessene Komplexität), gute psychometrische Eigenschaften und eine hohe Benutzerfreundlichkeit. Seit März 2021 existiert eine Aktualisierung des MAAS-Global: der MAAS 2.0, mit einer inhaltlichen Neuausrichtung auf Kontext und einem höheren Fokus auf das Formative.Methode: Die überarbeitete Version des MAAS-2.0-Bewertungsbogens wurde nach Einholen der Erlaubnis der Autoren ins Deutsche übersetzt. Offene Fragen wurden mit dem Projektleiter des Überarbeitungsprozesses diskutiert. Ergebnisse: Die Überarbeitung erfolgte in Hinblick auf die Fokussierung auf den Bezugsrahmen des/der Patient*in, auf die Bereinigung von in der Vergangenheit ermittelten Unklarheiten bei der Bewertung mittels des MAAS-Globals sowie auf eine stärkere Angleichung an das zugrundeliegende Calgary-Cambridge-Modell. Des Weiteren erfuhr die zur Evaluation genutzte Skala eine Modifikation und nutzt nun eine formative Bewertungsreichweite ohne notenbezogene Einteilung. Schlussfolgerung: Mit der inhaltlichen Neuausrichtung vom MAAS-Global hin zum MAAS 2.0, und dem damit einhergehenden Fokus auf Bezugsrahmen, Kontext und das Formative, legt die hier vorgestellte Revision neue Schwerpunkte für zukünftige Evaluationen im Rahmen der Aus- und Weiterbildung und der Bewertung von Arzt-Patient-Kommunikation allgemein vor.

Background: The MAAS Global (Maastricht History-taking and Advice Scoring List ) is an internationally widely-used instrument in under- and postgraduate medical education. The focus is on the assessment of medical communication and clinical skills. The assessment tool, which has also been used in Germany since 2015, has a high-quality design (e.g. comprehensible structure, appropriate complexity), good psychometric properties and is very user-friendly. An update of MAAS Global, MAAS 2.0, was published in March 2021 with a new and greater focus on context and the formative.Method: The revised version of the MAAS 2.0 assessment sheet was translated into German with the authors' permission. Open questions were discussed with the revision process project manager. Results: The revision was carried out with a view to focusing on the patient's frame of reference, removing ambiguities identified previously while using MAAS Global, and closer alignment with the underlying Calgary-Cambridge model. Furthermore, the scale used for the evaluation was modified and now uses a formative evaluation range without grade-related classification. Conclusion: With the content reorientation of MAAS Global to MAAS 2.0, and the associated focus on frame of reference, context, the formative, the revision presented here sets new priorities for future evaluations in the context of under- and postgraduate medical education and the assessment of medical patient communication in general.

Related Organizations
Keywords

medicine, LC8-6691, Education, Medical, communication, Communication, Medizin, R, MAAS Global, Kommunikation, MAAS-Global, Arzt-Patient-Kommunikation, doctor patient communication, Special aspects of education, Article, MAAS 2.0, ddc: 610, maas 2.0, Germany, Medicine, Humans, Clinical Competence, Educational Measurement, maas global

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold