Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Serous fluid cytopathology: International system].

Authors: Céline, Basset; Laetitia, Collin; Philippe, Vielh; Monique, Courtade-Saïdi;

[Serous fluid cytopathology: International system].

Abstract

The International System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology is a cytologic classification which purpose is to establish a consensus on diagnostic terminology. Five diagnostic categories are proposed associated to an increased rate of malignancy and specific cytological criteria. The categories are reported as: (I) Non-diagnostic (ND), the cells are insufficient for interpretation; (II) Negative for malignancy (NFM), only benign cells are present; (III) Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), the cells present mild atypia more likely to be benign, but a malignant process cannot be definitively excluded; (IV) Suspicious for malignancy (SFM), the cells are present with atypia or in a number suspect of malignancy but with insufficient ancillary studies to give a positive malignant diagnosis; (V) Malignant (MAL), the cytological criteria are absolutely and definitively malignant. Malignant neoplasia can be primitive, it involves mesothelioma and serous lymphoma but most are secondary and correspond mainly to adenocarcinomas in adults and leukemia/lymphoma in children. The diagnostic should always be provided in the appropriate clinical context and be as definitive as possible. The ND, AUS and SFM are temporary or last intention categories. Immunocytochemistry in association with FISH or flow cytometry allow in most cases a conclusive diagnosis. These ancillary studies as well as ADN and ARN tests on effusion's fluids are particularly suited to give reliable theranostic results for personalized therapies.

Keywords

Mesothelioma, Leukemia, Cytodiagnosis, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Humans, Thyroid Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!