Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Problem of standardising growth rates for animals suckled in separate litters.

Authors: A N, Peeling; T, Looker;

Problem of standardising growth rates for animals suckled in separate litters.

Abstract

The tendency of animals suckled in different litters to grow at different rates is already known to be a serious problem for experimental design in developmental biology. However, the contribution made by avoidable technical practices, such as failure to standardise litter size, to this litter effect is not clear from the literature. The present study sought to minimise the litter effect by carefully contriving five litters of rats to be similar in many respects likely to affect growth rate. These litters were raised simultaneously by mutually similar maternal animals in the same room. Their growth rates were not, in fact, equal: significant effects of litter were resolved on three growth rate dependent variables by the thirtieth postnatal day. The extent of this effect (as great as the between animal variance, despite the attempts to minimise it), and its implications for the interpretation of publications in which it is ignored are briefly discussed. Solutions are offered for the problem litter effects cause for experimental design.

Keywords

Male, Quality Control, Kinetics, Statistics as Topic, Animals, Brain, Organ Size, Animals, Suckling, Rats

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!