Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Macroprolactin screening in 464 patients with hyperprolactinaemia.

Authors: M H, Lim; C K M, Ho;

Macroprolactin screening in 464 patients with hyperprolactinaemia.

Abstract

Macroprolactinaemia is usually detected by polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation in clinical laboratories. Laboratory data on prolactin and macroprolactin screening by PEG precipitation in a tertiary hospital were reviewed in order to revise the local policy for reflex screening and reporting of macroprolactin in patients with hyperprolactinaemia.Paired prolactin results from 464 patients before and after PEG precipitation, either requested by a clinician or performed as a reflex test, were retrieved and reviewed.Recovery of prolactin after PEG treatment was highly variable (3.7 to 97.7%). The distribution of prolactin recovery percentages after PEG precipitation in patients with true hyperprolactinaemia was markedly different from that in patients without true hyperprolactinaemia. The proportion of patients with true hyperprolactinaemia increased gradually with increasing pre-PEG prolactin concentrations; the reverse was true with macroprolactinaemia. Five patients (1.1%) were found to have co-existing macroprolactinaemia and true hyperprolactinaemia.Results from this retrospective study indicate that macroprolactinaemia is common and can be present even in patients with very high serum prolactin concentrations. There is no cut-off limit for pre-PEG serum prolactin concentration that can totally exclude macroprolactinaemia. Moreover, co-existence of true hyperprolactinaemia and macroprolactinaemia in the same patient is not a rare phenomenon. Post-PEG prolactin concentration and percentage recovery should be reported together to guide the interpretation and management of hyperprolactinaemia.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Hyperprolactinemia, Humans, Mass Screening, Polyethylene Glycols, Prolactin, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!