Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Dry chemistry of reagent strips].

Authors: J P, Colombo;

[Dry chemistry of reagent strips].

Abstract

Quantitative analysis with dry reagent strips for the determination of clinical chemistry parameters and drug monitoring in serum, plasma and whole blood is expanding in small laboratories and in office laboratories. The systems predominantly used are Ektachem DT 60, the Seralyzer and the Reflotron. - The methods offered comprise substrates, enzymes, electrolytes, CO2 and drugs. The spectrum of feasible tests varies with the manufacturer. On the whole all the tests commonly used in small laboratories are covered. The instruments used for quantitative dry reagent strip chemistry are calibrated by the manufacturer. Calibration data are either inputted to the instrument with each method or already programmed in the apparatus. Thus calibration is outside the control of the user, a change of philosophy which does not correspond to present concepts of quality control in clinical chemistry. The analytical precision is satisfactory for all three instruments for the common parameters measured. A comparison between "dry-chemistry" determinations and the classical aqueous analyses show good accuracy as long as patient samples are used. This is, however, not true for all reference materials, presumably due to matrix effects. Our own evaluation of the Seralyzer showed a good correlation of potassium analysis compared with flame photometry; this was also true of gamma-glutamyltransferase using the Reflotron with patient samples. Internal quality control can only be performed with materials assessed by the instrument manufacturers, and the results will often differ for these materials when assayed with conventional methods or with other "dry-chemistry" methods. External quality control also has its limitations due to the fact that no sera are available which could be used universally.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Keywords

Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Chemistry, Clinical, Reagent Strips

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!