Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Hydrophilic contact lenses and pathogenic microorganisms].

Authors: A M, Simitzis-Le Flohic; B, Guisnel; G, Kerdraon; F, Beaudre; J, Colin; C, Chastel;

[Hydrophilic contact lenses and pathogenic microorganisms].

Abstract

A first study was conducted on 243 hydrophilic contact lenses: 65 were macroscopically abnormal and 100 were infected with fungi. Moreover on Sabouraud's medium with chloramphenicol, 30 bacterial strains were isolated of which 25 Pseudomonas sp. (10 Ps. cepacia) and 1 Serratia liquefaciens. Then a second study was conducted on 107 among the 243 lens solutions: the 50 of the B trade mark were spoiled with 12 X 10(7) bacteria/ml and the 57 of the C trade mark with 5 X 10(7) bacteria/ml. This quantitative bacterial difference was confirmed with a qualitative one: from B trade-mark 6 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were isolated and from C only one. The authors emphasize the importance of Ps. aeruginosa in corneal ulcers associated with contact lenses, of lens solution composition, and of preservative usefulness.

Keywords

Bacteria, Pseudomonas, Fungi, Ophthalmic Solutions, Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!