Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ University of Southe...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

The Danish linguistic validation of the Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire.

Authors: Obro, Louise Faurholt; Pilegaard, Morten; Petersen, Inge; Osther, Palle; Joshi, Hrishi; Jung, Helene;

The Danish linguistic validation of the Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to validate the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) in Danish for patients with indwelling ureteral stents.The linguistic validation of the original USSQ was performed following standardised multi-step translation procedures. Seventy patients with indwelling ureteral stents were asked to complete the Danish USSQ one and two weeks after stent placement and four weeks after stent removal.A total of 65 patients (92.9%) completed the USSQ. Statistical evaluation revealed good internal consistency in all domains except work performance. Satisfactory convergent validity (less-than -0.4 or greater-than 0.4) was demonstrated for urinary symptoms, body pain and global quality of life. The test-retest reliability-coefficient was statistically significant for urinary symptoms, general health, pain and sexual matters. Inter-domain associations were positive and monotone for all subscales. All sub-scores, except sexual matters, significantly decreased from one week after stent insertion to four weeks after stent removal (p less-than 0.001).The Danish USSQ is a reliable and valid instrument with which to evaluate urinary symptoms and general health in patients with indwelling ureteral stents.Ideforum, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, granted 80,000 DKK to support this work.The Danish National Ethics Committee and Region Syddanmark approved the study (Study approval number 20192000-168 and journal number 19-52219, respectively).

Country
Denmark
Keywords

Denmark, Pain, Reproducibility of Results, Linguistics, Ureter/surgery, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Stents, Stents/adverse effects, Ureter

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold