Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

IgM-IFA, IgM-ELISA, DS-IgM-ELISA, IgM-ISAGA, performed on whole serum and IgM fractions, for detection of IgM anti-toxoplasma antibodies during pregnancy.

Authors: FILICE, GAETANO; Carnevale G.; MERONI, VALERIA; Caligaris S.; Ottoboni P.; Milano F.; Carosi G.;

IgM-IFA, IgM-ELISA, DS-IgM-ELISA, IgM-ISAGA, performed on whole serum and IgM fractions, for detection of IgM anti-toxoplasma antibodies during pregnancy.

Abstract

The traditional IgM-ELISA has a better sensibility and specificity than IgM-IFA when these two tests are performed on whole sera, but in many cases (sera titer values of greater than 200 I.U./ml) the presence of IgM antitoxoplasma antibodies can be detected only after purification of IgM fractions. The separations of IgM fractions avoids either false positive results due to the rheumatoid factors or antinuclear antibodies, and false negative results due to the competition between IgG and IgM antibodies. The present investigation has shown that antibody titers obtained by IgM-IFA and traditional IgM-ELISA correlate well with DS-IgM-ELISA and IgM-ISAGA performed on whole serum. The false negative results that frequently occur with IgM-IFA and traditional IgM-ELISA performed on whole sera having sera titer values of greater than 200 I.U./ml in IgG IFA are avoided when the same sera were tested by DS-IgM-ELISA and IgM-ISAGA. All the sera which gave positive results by DS-IgM-ELISA were also positive when tested with IgM-ISAGA. Our researches demonstrate the high specificity and sensitivity of IgM-ISAGA and DS-IgM-ELISA performed on whole serum.

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
Keywords

Immunoglobulin M, Pregnancy, 616, 610, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Humans, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Toxoplasma, Antibodies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!