Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

High count rate first-pass radionuclide angiography using a digital gamma camera.

Authors: R, Gal; R P, Grenier; J, Carpenter; D H, Schmidt; S C, Port;

High count rate first-pass radionuclide angiography using a digital gamma camera.

Abstract

In this study, first-pass radionuclide angiography (FPRNA) was performed using a digital single-crystal gamma camera. Twenty-nine men and six women (ages 43-80, mean 61 yr) underwent FPRNA in the supine position immediately prior to cardiac catheterization. Total counts/sec in the whole field-of-view in the right ventricular phase were 150,352 +/- 26,006. Background uncorrected counts in the representative cycle were 7,651 +/- 2,527 at end-diastolie and 4,904 +/- 2,314 at end-systolie. A linear correlation between FPRNA left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and contrast LV ejection fraction gave an r = 0.95 with an s.e.e. of 0.05. Analyses of intra- and interobserver variability gave r = 0.99 and 0.98 and an s.e.e. of 0.02 and 0.03, respectively. Spearman-Rank correlation coefficients between FPRNA and contrast angiographic wall-motion scores were greater than 0.8 for all walls, while sensitivity/specificity were 0.86/0.90, 0.76/1.00, 0.76/1.00 for anterior, apical, and inferior wall-motion abnormalities, respectively. We conclude that satisfactory counting statistics for FPRNA can be obtained with a digital gamma camera, and that accurate and reproducible measurements of global and regional left ventricular function can be obtained with this technique.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Cardiac Catheterization, Electronic Data Processing, Cineradiography, Heart Ventricles, Movement, Middle Aged, Pentetic Acid, Coronary Angiography, Image Enhancement, Coronary Vessels, Diastole, Humans, Scintillation Counting, Female, Prospective Studies, Radionuclide Imaging, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    32
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
32
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!