Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Infection and neonatal meningitis: epidemiology, pathogen spectrum, therapy].

Authors: C P, Speer; M, Gahr; D, Hauptmann; P, Stubbe; W, Schröter;

[Infection and neonatal meningitis: epidemiology, pathogen spectrum, therapy].

Abstract

Data from 196 infants were analyzed who had been treated for neonatal septicemia and/or meningitis between 1962-1974 (n = 88) and 1975-1985 (n = 108). In addition to an increase in the incidence of septicemia (1962-1974: 0.88 cases/1000 live births/year; 1975-1985: 1.8 cases/1000 live births/year) there was also a change in the pattern of infection. Group B streptococcal infections were first observed in 1975. Infections with Escherichia coli increased (1962-1974: 0.25 cases/1000 live births/year; 1975-1985: 0.65 cases/1000 live births/year). Although the incidence of meningitis was similar in both periods (1962-1985: 0.45 cases/1000 live births/year) the relative number of cases declined (1962-1974: 51 of 88 patients; 1975-1985 25 of 108). Mortality also decreased during the second period (1962-1974: 53%; 1975-1985: 29%). All infants were primarily treated with a combination of ampicillin and gentamicin. The decision to discontinue this therapy was based on the clinical course of the patient and the results of culture and susceptibility studies. Ampicillin and/or gentamicin were effective in vitro against all microorganisms which caused septicemia and/or meningitis within the first four days of life. In contrast this antimicrobial combination was only active in vitro against 77% of the pathogens isolated after this time period.

Keywords

Sweden, Cross-Sectional Studies, Sepsis, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Meningitis, Bacterial Infections, Anti-Bacterial Agents

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!