
Fresh specimens of human lymphatic neoplasms were tested with the differential staining cytotoxicity assay. Cells from relapsed patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were significantly more resistant to vincristine, dexamethasone, and doxorubicin in the assay than were cells from previously untreated patients. The putative C kinase inhibitors verapamil (V), imipramine (I), lidocaine (L), tamoxifen (T), chlorpromazine (C), and haloperidol (H) were then tested singly, in combination with each other (VILTCH, ITCH, and VL), and in combination with vincristine. At concentrations judged to be clinically achievable, VILTCH itself was occasionally toxic to ALL and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The VILTCH combination clearly potentiated the cytotoxic activity of vincristine in five of eight ALL specimens from relapsed patients and potentiated vincristine in 18 of 30 chronic lymphocytic leukemia specimens. It also potentiated vincristine in two of six specimens of multiple myeloma and five of six specimens of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The VILTCH combination had no significant effects in fresh cultures of normal human lymphocytes. The most active drugs in the VILTCH combination appeared to be verapamil and lidocaine. We conclude that the differential staining cytotoxicity assay is a useful tool to study the circumvention of clinically acquired drug resistance. While the mechanism of the observed enhancement of the cytotoxic effects of vincristine is not known, it is possible that combinations of putative C kinase inhibitors may reduce drug resistance in human lymphatic neoplasms.
Imipramine, Leukemia, Cell Survival, Chlorpromazine, Drug Resistance, Lidocaine, Drug Synergism, In Vitro Techniques, Leukemia, Lymphoid, Tamoxifen, Verapamil, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Haloperidol, Humans, Protein Kinase C
Imipramine, Leukemia, Cell Survival, Chlorpromazine, Drug Resistance, Lidocaine, Drug Synergism, In Vitro Techniques, Leukemia, Lymphoid, Tamoxifen, Verapamil, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Haloperidol, Humans, Protein Kinase C
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
