Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Kidney Disease: Kidney Stones.

Authors: Ada, Hoffman; Michael M, Braun; Maurice, Khayat;

Kidney Disease: Kidney Stones.

Abstract

Kidney stones have a prevalence of 8.8% in the United States, with men affected more than women (10.6% versus 7.1%). Most stones are composed of calcium oxalate (61%). Calcium phosphate (15%) and uric acid (12%) stones are the second and third most common types. Risk factors include renal and ureteral anatomic abnormalities, family history, previous stones, older age, and various drugs. Factors that increase the risk of stone development include obesity, older age, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and hypertension. Symptoms include renal colic, dysuria, urinary frequency, hematuria, fever, flank pain, and groin pain. Renal ultrasonography is the recommended first-line imaging modality, and is preferred in pregnant patients. Metabolic testing is recommended in high-risk patients (eg, with a family history of stones, one kidney, malabsorption or intestinal disease). A nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug is the first drug of choice for pain management. Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is considered first-line therapy if stones do not resolve with observation. MET is recommended for patients with uncomplicated distal ureteral stones 10 mm in diameter or less. If a stone fails to pass, other interventions (eg, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, ureteroscopy, ureteral stents, nephrostomy tubes) can be considered, depending on the situation. Increased fluid intake and dietary interventions can reduce the risk of recurrence.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, United States, Kidney Calculi, Recurrence, Lithotripsy, Ureteroscopy, Humans, Female, Aged, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!