Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Clonogenicity and experimental metastatic potential of spontaneous mouse mammary neoplasms.

Authors: J E, Price;

Clonogenicity and experimental metastatic potential of spontaneous mouse mammary neoplasms.

Abstract

Spontaneous primary mammary tumors of C3H-Avy mice differ in metastatic colonization potential, some producing many lung deposits (high-colonization potential) and others producing few or none (low-colonization potential) after iv inoculation of cells. The degree of metastasis from undisturbed neoplasms also varies from tumor to tumor. This study examined whether these differences between tumors could be accounted for by differences in clonogenic or stem cell content. Tests for clonogenic cells were: growth in 0.3% agarose and limiting dilution assays. Mammary tumor cells of known colonization potential were inoculated iv at serially reduced doses, and the relationship between number of cells injected and number of lung deposits formed was determined. Parallel in vitro dose-response assays in 0.3% agarose were performed with the use of cells from the same primary tumors. Colony-forming efficiency in 0.3% agarose cultures varied between individual primary mammary tumors and was positively associated with experimental metastatic potential, suggesting that the stem or clonogenic cell content of primary tumors is one of the important determinants of the metastatic phenotype.

Keywords

Mice, Inbred C3H, Lung Neoplasms, Sepharose, Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental, Culture Media, Colony-Forming Units Assay, Agar, Mice, Animals, Female, Neoplasm Metastasis, Tumor Stem Cell Assay

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    32
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
32
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!