Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Induction of differentiation of Friend murine erythroleukemia cells by poly-L-lysine and daunorubicin-poly-L-lysine conjugate.

Authors: R, Supino; N, Gibelli; F, Zunino;

Induction of differentiation of Friend murine erythroleukemia cells by poly-L-lysine and daunorubicin-poly-L-lysine conjugate.

Abstract

The ability of the synthetic cationic polypeptide poly-L-lysine (PLL) to induce differentiation of Friend murine erythroleukemia cells was examined with the use of polymers of different molecular weights. Like other membrane-interacting agents (polar solvents), all the polymers tested were effective in inducing cell differentiation. This effect was found to be molecular weight dependent, as already reported for other membrane-related actions of these polymers. Since anthracyclines also exert direct effects on the cell membrane, the activity of the daunorubicin-PLL conjugate was also examined. The covalent linking of the drug to the polyamino acid somewhat reduced the differentiation-inducing activity in this system. Indeed, free daunorubicin was found to inhibit the maturational process. Although the inducing effect was observed when the free PLL or daunorubicin-linked PLL was added alone, polymers enhanced differentiation produced by suboptimal concentrations of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Since PLL was inactive as an initiator of the maturation of a DMSO-resistant line, it is likely that some events (presumably membrane-related effects) involved in the multistep stimulation process are common to polar-planar solvents and the polycationic polymer.

Keywords

Molecular Weight, Mice, Daunorubicin, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Dimethyl Sulfoxide, Polylysine, Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute, Cells, Cultured, Friend murine leukemia virus

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!