Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Diagnostic Cut-Off Value of RDW for Screening Thalassemia and the Combined Determination of MCV, MCH, HBA 2 and RDW].

Authors: Qi-Ling, Song; Yang-Liu, Guo; Yong-Jun, He; Cheng, He; Ting, Zhang; Yan, Cai; Wen, Liu; +2 Authors

[Diagnostic Cut-Off Value of RDW for Screening Thalassemia and the Combined Determination of MCV, MCH, HBA 2 and RDW].

Abstract

To explore the value of red cell distribution width (RDW), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) and hemoglobin (Hb) A2 combined determination scheme for screening thalassemia.The RDW levels of thalassemia group and healthy control group were detected and compared. The efficiency of RDW for screening thalassemia was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The diagnostic cut-off value of RDW was also acquired by Youden index. Then, 3 groups for thalassemia screening scheme were set, including MCV+MCH+HBA 2, MCV+MCH+RDW(>16.0)+HBA 2 and MCV+MCH+RDW(>15.15)+HBA 2. The performances of the 3 groups were evaluated through screening 621 clinical suspected cases of thalassemia.The RDW level in thalassemia group was significantly higher than that in healthy control group (P15.15, when the Youden index was the biggest among all data. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false negative rate and consistency rate of MCV+MCH+RDW(>15.15)+HBA 2 group was 75.46%, 48.83%, 26.50%, 89.06%, 24.54%, and 54.06%, respectively.The diagnostic cut-off value of RDW for thalassemia screening has been established. The group of MCV(15.15) has a best efficiency among the 3 groups to screen thalassemia.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Erythrocyte Indices, Research, Humans, Mass Screening, Thalassemia, Hemoglobin A2

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!