Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[A Report on Health Resource Use in Internal Radiation Therapy Using 177Lu-DOTA-TATE].

Authors: Katsuhiko, Kato; Soichi, Nakamura; Yoshinori, Matoba; Seigo, Kinuya;

[A Report on Health Resource Use in Internal Radiation Therapy Using 177Lu-DOTA-TATE].

Abstract

Internal radiation therapy using lutetium-177(177Lu)-DOTA-TATE injection will be applied in actual clinical practice soon. However, the NHI medical technical fee for the use of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE injection has not yet been set. The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine surveyed health resource use in internal radiation therapy using 177Lu via questionnaires sent to medical institutions that have used 177Lu-DOTA-TATE injection. Results showed that the necessary cost per patient is 1,912,404 JPY, based on the Draft Proposal for Medical Examination Value (Ver. 7.2) of the Japanese Health Insurance Federation for Surgery. 177Lu-DOTA-TATE injection is supposed to be administered 4 times to each patient at 8-week intervals, and the fee per treatment was calculated to be 478,101 JPY. The appropriate NHI medical technical fee is thus considered to be 47,810 points per patient per treatment, which can be claimed 4 times per patient. In addition, it costs 649,030 JPY per patient to take special measures to make the hospital room similar to the radiation therapy room. The cost other than the basic hospitalization fee per day was calculated to be 81,129 JPY. The appropriate additional points for NHI basic hospitalization fee is thus considered to be 8,113 points per patient per day.

Keywords

Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring, Brachytherapy, Health Resources, Humans, Radiopharmaceuticals

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!