Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[MIDDLE EAR CHOLESTEATOMA].

Authors: Michal, Luntz; Roni, Barzilai;

[MIDDLE EAR CHOLESTEATOMA].

Abstract

Cholesteatoma is the most severe middle ear disease. In most cases cholesteatoma results from under-aeration of the middle ear cleft. It is characterized by otorrhea and hearing loss, and may lead to severe complications, intra- and extra-cranial. There is no non-surgical treatment for cholesteatoma. Surgical treatment is the only option. Cholesteatoma is diagnosed by micro-otoscopy. When cholesteatoma is suspected and otoscopy is inconclusive, imaging is mandatory. The goal of treatment in cholesteatoma is to achieve a stable and safe ear. In most cases, upon diagnosis, cholesteatoma is quite extensive and mastoidectomy is needed. Choice of surgery [Canal wall up mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty (the more conservative alternative), Canal wall down (radical) mastoidectomy with meatoplasty or Canal wall down (radical) mastoidectomy with reconstruction of external ear canal, tympanoplasty and mastoid obliteration], depends on the extent of the disease, the anatomic relationship between the sensitive structures that protrude into the walls of middle ear and mastoid cavities and the bony destruction that had already been caused by the disease. Hearing rehabilitation should lead to a stable, predictable, symmetric and as close as possible to normal hearing threshold. In many cases the solution is external or implantable hearing devices. Cholesteatoma has a high recidivism rate that leads to repeated surgery. In order to diagnose and treat cholesteatoma recidivism, a structured follow-up is needed after cholesteatoma surgery, with periodical otoscopy (every 6-12 months) and MRI (every 1-2 years). When cholesteatoma recidivism is diagnosed, surgery is indicated before the disease grows and becomes infected.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Treatment Outcome, Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear, Mastoidectomy, Humans, Mastoid, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!