
The therapeutic and rehabilitative use of neurotechnologies against disabling diseases for which common treatments are partially or completely ineffective is developing more and more rapidly. Projects for the installation of brain-computer interfaces capable of enhancing perceptions, saving memories, amplifying and canceling them selectively are now a reality. The mental domain, which has always been considered the private sphere par excellence, the last territory inaccessible even to the rampant intrusiveness of "datism", is in serious danger. The ethical implications of such possible derives are not addressable by existing protections and rules. New specific rights are needed for the neural domain, real neuro rights, to define and realize the extent of change, one of the greatest challenges of our time, in an ethically and socially shareable way, in order not to allow violating the last bulwark of the subjective identity of humanity, the mental privacy.
Privacy, Brain-Computer Interfaces, Humans
Privacy, Brain-Computer Interfaces, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
