Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

To Text or Not to Text? That is the Question.

Authors: Gregory L. Alexander; Riley Harrell; Sue Shumate; Mason Rothert; Amy A. Vogelsmeier; Lori L. Popejoy; Marilyn Rantz;

To Text or Not to Text? That is the Question.

Abstract

Texting is ubiquitous with a text frequency of 145 billion/day worldwide. This paper provides partial results of the national demonstration project called the Missouri Quality Improvement Initiative (MOQI). MOQI goals were to reduce avoidable hospitalizations using APRNs to infuse evidence-based practices, model appropriate decisions and improve communication among workers responsible for nursing home resident care. This is a retrospective content analysis of text messages sent and received via a secure, password protected, encrypted mobile text message platform called Mediprocity. Text messages were created by 15 APRNs and a PhD-RN project supervisor working in 16 nursing homes over 6 months (January 1-June 30 2018). During the 6 months of data collection 8,946 text messages were captured, coded and analyzed. Data included 1,018 sent messages and 7,928 received messages. The most common messages sent (n=324) and received (n=2319) were about patient updates. The second most common texts included messages confirming information (n=1312).

Keywords

Advanced Practice Nursing, Text Messaging, Missouri, Communication, Quality Improvement, Nursing Homes, Hospitalization, Evidence-Based Practice, Humans, Models, Nursing, Smartphone, Quality of Health Care, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!