
Nursing researchers are advised to consider the reliability and validity of psychologic instruments used in research; however, evaluation of physiologic, or clinical, instruments is not always given the same attention. Reliability and validity issues related to physiologic measures will be discussed. Terms commonly used for the evaluation of physiologic instruments, such as "accuracy," "precision," and "sensitivity," will be explained, with parallels drawn to traditional measurement terms. Sources of potential measurement error, such as environment, user, subject, machine, and interpretation error, will be explained and specific examples given from cardiopulmonary nursing research.
Equipment and Supplies, Research, Humans, Nursing Care, Diagnostic Errors, Man-Machine Systems, Monitoring, Physiologic
Equipment and Supplies, Research, Humans, Nursing Care, Diagnostic Errors, Man-Machine Systems, Monitoring, Physiologic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
