Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Strain difference in the micronucleus test. The Collaborative Study Group for the Micronucleus Test.

Strain difference in the micronucleus test. The Collaborative Study Group for the Micronucleus Test.

Abstract

The Collaborative Study Group for the Micronucleus Test, a task group of the Environmental Mutagen Society of Japan, has earlier addressed the question of sex difference as a source of variation in the micronucleus test. Strain difference, another issue in test protocols requiring urgent clarification, was selected as the subject of the second study. Male mice of strains Slc:ddY (ddY), CRJ: CD-1(ICR) (CD-1), Slc:BDF1 (BDF1), and ms:Hal (ms) were treated with 6 different chemicals chosen from various classes of micronucleus inducers: colchicine, 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene, ethyl methanesulfonate, N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea, 6-mercaptopurine, and potassium chromate. All 4 strains gave positive results with all 6 chemicals, although ms tended to show the highest responses. ddY and CD-1 were low responders, while BDF1 was intermediate between ms and the other two. Although ms seemed superior to the other strains, its high responses became manifest mostly at high dose levels. ms was not always the most sensitive strain; it responded moderately to ethyl methanesulfonate. Also the background level of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was the highest in ms, but this did not explain the apparent high sensitivity of this strain. Despite the strain differences, it can be concluded that any of the other strains used seems to suffice as a tester for the micronucleus test.

Keywords

Cell Nucleus, Male, Mutagenicity Tests, Potassium Compounds, Mice, Inbred Strains, Mice, Sex Factors, Species Specificity, Chromates, Animals, Female, Colchicine, Mutagens

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!