
pmid: 33331711
handle: 2066/229079
Technological developments in ophthalmic imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) create new possibilities for diagnostics in eye care. AI has already been applied in ophthalmic diabetes care. AI-systems currently detect diabetic retinopathy in general practice with a high sensitivity and specificity. AI-systems for the screening, monitoring and treatment of age-related macular degeneration and glaucoma are promising and are still being developed. AI-algorithms, however, only perform tasks for which they have been specifically trained and highly depend on the data and reference-standard that were used to train the system in identifying a certain abnormality or disease. How the data and the gold standard were established and determined, influences the performance of the algorithm. Furthermore, interpretability of deep learning algorithms is still an ongoing issue. By highlighting on images the areas that were critical for the decision of the algorithm, users can gain more insight into how algorithms come to a particular result.
Contains fulltext : 229079.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)
Diagnostic Imaging, Diabetic Retinopathy, Radboudumc 12: Sensory disorders DCMN: Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, General Practice, Glaucoma, Sensitivity and Specificity, Macular Degeneration, Artificial Intelligence, Medical Imaging - Radboud University Medical Center, Humans, Mass Screening, Ophthalmology - Radboud University Medical Center, Algorithms
Diagnostic Imaging, Diabetic Retinopathy, Radboudumc 12: Sensory disorders DCMN: Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, General Practice, Glaucoma, Sensitivity and Specificity, Macular Degeneration, Artificial Intelligence, Medical Imaging - Radboud University Medical Center, Humans, Mass Screening, Ophthalmology - Radboud University Medical Center, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
