
pmid: 33223821
pmc: PMC7672711
This study analyzes every eye that had an outcome greater than 0.25D of sphere or astigmatism from planned goal after treatment with WaveLight Contoura with LYRA Protocol.The study included 266 consecutive eyes treated with LASIK Contoura using the LYRA Protocol. All LASIK procedures were performed on the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser. Flaps were created with either the Alcon WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser or the Moria M2 microkeratome. Eyes that were off by >0.25 diopters (D) sphere or cylinder from the targeted goal within 3 months after surgery were identified and analyzed for cause. Topographical, higher-order aberration, and epithelial maps were created.Causes for inaccurate outcomes were biomechanical corneal change from LASK flap creation (9.78% of total eyes), pre-operative epithelial compensation of corneal higher-order aberration (4.1% of total eyes), changes to lamellar corneal tension from laser ablation causing a hyperopic shift (1.9% of total eyes), epithelial thickening over the ablation area post-operatively causing a refractive change (1.5% of total eyes), and posterior astigmatism (0.75%).The causes of the majority of inaccurate outcomes have not been properly defined and must be incorporated into further improving outcomes. Current and planned advances in technology do not address the majority of these causes.
corneal epithelium, Ophthalmology, astigmatism, femtosecond laser, higher-order aberration, Clinical Ophthalmology, lasik, refractive error, RE1-994, Original Research
corneal epithelium, Ophthalmology, astigmatism, femtosecond laser, higher-order aberration, Clinical Ophthalmology, lasik, refractive error, RE1-994, Original Research
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
