Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Surgical success rates in acquired, comitant, partially accommodative and nonaccommodative esotropia.

Authors: M, Scheiman; E, Ciner;

Surgical success rates in acquired, comitant, partially accommodative and nonaccommodative esotropia.

Abstract

An extensive literature search covering the last 35 years was undertaken to retrieve all English language articles reporting results of surgical management of acquired, comitant, nonaccommodative and partially accommodative esotropia. Thirty-nine studies were found, but only 15 met the minimum criteria which we established for inclusion in our analysis. The functional success rate was 15% in 1170 patients, while the overall cosmetic success rate was 43% in 1473 patients. Direct comparison to optometric studies is not possible since the criteria for success used in surgical studies are considerably different. The most prevalent complication is the need for reoperation as a result of consecutive exotropia. The data indicate that an end result of consecutive exotropia is almost as likely as a functional cure.

Keywords

Reoperation, Strabismus, Esotropia, Postoperative Complications, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Accommodation, Ocular, Humans, Surgery, Plastic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!