Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Plastic Surgery and Cosmetic Procedures: Augmentation and Reconstruction Procedures.

Authors: Tam T, Nguyen; Prasad, Kilaru;

Plastic Surgery and Cosmetic Procedures: Augmentation and Reconstruction Procedures.

Abstract

In 2018, breast augmentation was the most common cosmetic surgical procedure performed in the United States. It was the most commonly performed cosmetic surgical procedure in women ages 18 to 34 years. Silicone gel-filled implants are the most commonly used in the United States, followed by saline-filled implants. The most common approach to placement of implants is through an incision in the inframammary fold. The majority of implants are placed subglandularly, under the breast tissue but on top of the pectoralis muscle. Postoperative complications include lumps, asymmetry, leakage or deflation, capsular contracture, changes or loss of nipple and areolar sensation, seroma, hematoma, changes in breast shape, and infection. Long-term complications include infection, implant rupture, capsular contracture, and breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Any patient who has undergone breast augmentation who presents with a breast lump or mass should be referred to a breast unit for evaluation. Lumps can indicate implant rupture, capsular contracture, seroma, hematoma, breast cancer, or infection. Studies have shown no association between silicone-filled breast implants and connective tissue disorders. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy frequently involves placement of implants. Autologous reconstruction remains another option. Various implants are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for buttock and calf augmentation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Silicone Gels, Young Adult, Adolescent, Breast Implants, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Surgery, Plastic, Mastectomy, United States

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!