Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Engineering the oil binding capacity and crystallinity of self-assembled fibrillar networks of in edible oils.

Authors: Michael A, Rogers; Amanda J, Wright; Alejandro G, Marangoni;

Engineering the oil binding capacity and crystallinity of self-assembled fibrillar networks of in edible oils.

Abstract

The crystallinity and oil binding capacity of 12-hydroxystearic acid (12HSA)-vegetable oil organogels was modified by changing the post-crystallization annealing temperature from 5 °C to 30 °C for 24 h. The gels stored at 5 °C had a highly branched crystalline structure with small uniform pores, as determined by cryo-scanning electron microscopy. Large T2proton relaxation peaks at 50 to 70 ms determined by pulse nuclear magnetic resonance (pNMR) suggested the presence of highly immobilized oil at 5 °C. When the gels were stored at 30 °C, longer fibers and a less branched network were observed. At 30 °C, the 12HSA network's crystallinity was enhanced with fewer inclusions of liquid oil as determined by pNMR. When the gels were stored at 30 °C, a significantly shorter T2 relaxation peak was observed. The increased crystallinity, at 30 °C, was attributed to a reduction in bulk supersaturation, resulting in a very high crystallographic mismatch nucleation barrier (ΔG*) which favored one-dimensional fiber growth. However, at a lower crystallization temperature of 5 °C, there is an increase in the supersaturation and hence the crystallographic mismatch barrier is significantly lower, increasing fiber tip branching. The nucleation-growth-branching-growth model for self-assembled fibrillar networks explains the differences in crystallinity, pore size and oil syneresis observed for the 12HSA-vegetable oil organogels. It was found that the gels stored at 30 °C syneresised 1.35 times faster than the gels stored at 5 °C. Furthermore, the change in the T2 relaxations and the ratio of the complex viscosity/pore radius were 1.35 and 1.30 respectively.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!