
When esophageal reconstruction has to be repeated the most usual reason is the inadequate length of the transplant. This is mainly due to unfavorable vascular architecture, necrosis of the proximal end, and tactical or technical errors in selection and placement of the transplant and the evaluation of vascular supply and length. Mobilization of the transplant is a relatively low-risk method used in esophageal reconstruction. In some cases remobilization can be combined with transfer of the transplant from the subcutaneous channel to the retrosternal space. The indications for repeat esophageal reconstruction with new transplant material are necrosis or malignant degeneration of the transplant and failure of attempts to reuse the initial transplant.
Adult, Male, Reoperation, Adolescent, Esophageal Neoplasms, Leiomyoma, Colon, Middle Aged, Necrosis, Postoperative Complications, Esophagoplasty, Burns, Chemical, Intestine, Small, Surgical Wound Dehiscence, Esophageal Stenosis, Humans, Female, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Male, Reoperation, Adolescent, Esophageal Neoplasms, Leiomyoma, Colon, Middle Aged, Necrosis, Postoperative Complications, Esophagoplasty, Burns, Chemical, Intestine, Small, Surgical Wound Dehiscence, Esophageal Stenosis, Humans, Female, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
