Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The incomplete esophagoplasty].

Authors: A, Tschernousov; Z, Ter-Avetikjan;

[The incomplete esophagoplasty].

Abstract

When esophageal reconstruction has to be repeated the most usual reason is the inadequate length of the transplant. This is mainly due to unfavorable vascular architecture, necrosis of the proximal end, and tactical or technical errors in selection and placement of the transplant and the evaluation of vascular supply and length. Mobilization of the transplant is a relatively low-risk method used in esophageal reconstruction. In some cases remobilization can be combined with transfer of the transplant from the subcutaneous channel to the retrosternal space. The indications for repeat esophageal reconstruction with new transplant material are necrosis or malignant degeneration of the transplant and failure of attempts to reuse the initial transplant.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Reoperation, Adolescent, Esophageal Neoplasms, Leiomyoma, Colon, Middle Aged, Necrosis, Postoperative Complications, Esophagoplasty, Burns, Chemical, Intestine, Small, Surgical Wound Dehiscence, Esophageal Stenosis, Humans, Female, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!