Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Agglutination reaction of T. cruzi, T. cruzi like Strains, T. rangeli and T. conorhini with Soja hispida lectin and Aaptos papillata protectin (author's transl)].

Authors: H, Mühlpfordt; J, Schottelius;

[Agglutination reaction of T. cruzi, T. cruzi like Strains, T. rangeli and T. conorhini with Soja hispida lectin and Aaptos papillata protectin (author's transl)].

Abstract

Protectin from the sponge Aaptos papillata (Keller) was used in the characterization of five strains of T. cruzi (Venezuela, Guatemala, Y. Brasilien, Peru, Wien) and six T. cruzi like strains (Triatoma, Maryland, ITMAP 943, FH4, FH5, LN). Based upon their membrane receptors, these T. cruzi and T. cruzi like isolates could be differentiated from rangeli (Venezuela Strain) and T. conorhini (Hawai Strain) by agglutination reaction to the proctectin. Furthermore, after pronase treatment T.rangeli could also be distinguished from T. conorhini by agglutination test with A. papillata protectin and also Soja hispida lectin. It is not possible to differentiate the T. cruzi complex with S. hispida lectin, because it did not agglutinate T. cruzi (Vienna Strain) and T. cruzi like (Maryland Strain). However, after treating this human pathogenic strain with pronase the pseudocrypt antigen of the first order is made available to the S. hispida lecting thereby producing agglutination. The T. cruzi like strain however did not agglutinate with this treatment. On the other hand, while T. rangeli did not agglutinate even after pronase treatment, T. conorhini showed the agglutination reaction. This observed reaction is explained by the availability of the pseudocrypt antigens of the first order after pronase treatment.

Keywords

Trypanosoma, Agglutinins, Agglutination Tests, Lectins, Pronase, Trypanosoma cruzi, Animals, Porifera

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    19
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
19
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!