Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A nuclear DNA study of uterine cervical dysplasia with reference to its prognostic significance.

Authors: K, Yokosuka; K, Sato; T, Izutsu; T, Kagabu; I, Nishiya; G L, Wied;

A nuclear DNA study of uterine cervical dysplasia with reference to its prognostic significance.

Abstract

To further define the nuclear DNA content of uterine cervical dysplasia and its relationship to prognosis and epidemiological features, a retrospective study using Papanicolaou stained cytological specimen and TICAS was undertaken. 1. Dysplasia patients was common among young females who had a background of low age first pregnancy, multiple Gravidity-Parity, the complication of inflammation and the use of hormonal contraceptives and progressed rapidly. It is recommended that a test should be repeated within 2 to 3 months regardless of the severity of the dysplasia and patients should be followed up for at least 2.5 to 3 years. 2. The DNA histograms were classified into 3 types (A,B and C): Type C, which had the stem line in an aneuploidy area, showed more severe dysplastic cases. This may be due to the proliferation rate and significant alternation in the chromosomes and mitoses. Nuclear DNA analysis using TICAS and Papanicolaou stained cytological material could discriminate between the progressive group and the persistent or regressive group. In addition, the mean nuclear area might be the best indicator of prognosis in uterine cervical dysplasia.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Cell Nucleus, Vaginal Smears, Adolescent, DNA, Neoplasm, Aneuploidy, Prognosis, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Risk Factors, Humans, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Papanicolaou Test, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!