Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Washed erythrocyte concentrates. A contribution to the problem of the effect of wash procedures and storage time on erythrocytes in the preparation of blood].

Authors: V, Sachs; R, Dörner; V, Rehder;

[Washed erythrocyte concentrates. A contribution to the problem of the effect of wash procedures and storage time on erythrocytes in the preparation of blood].

Abstract

The question of how often erythrocytes should be washed in order to obtain a protein-free and therapeutically efficient unit of washed red blood cells is still controversial. To obtain more information regarding this problem, 6 X 15 units of whole blood were washed 1-6 times with a saline solution immediately and after 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35 days of storage. After each washing procedure the content of total protein, of immunglobulins A, G, and M and of complement factor C3 was determined in the supernatants, as well as the osmotic fragility in the corresponding erythrocyte sediments. The statistically analyzed results enabled us to describe the average degree of influences as equations and to recommend a preparation prescription. The results show that the protein levels decrease precipitously after the first and second washing procedures. The following 4 procedures have no significant effect. On the other hand, with increasing time of storage more washing procedures are necessary to reach the same results than with younger units. That is also true for the concentrations of immunoglobulins and complement C3. The osmotic fragility of the erythrocytes increases with each washing procedure as well as each day of storage. According to these results, an optimal, protein-free and effective unit of washed red blood cells is obtained when a 1-2-week-old unit of whole blood is washed 2-3 times.

Keywords

Osmotic Fragility, Time Factors, Blood Preservation, Humans, Blood Transfusion, Blood Proteins, Erythrocyte Transfusion

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!